Here's what I love about
Gillian Flynn, but others seem to dislike - not a single one of her
characters are likeable, but somehow I always thoroughly enjoy reading
her books. Sharp Objects is no exception. The story surrounds junior
reporter Camille Preaker, a journalist at a third tier newspaper in
Chicago. Camille is asked to return to her hometown of Wind Gap, MO to
cover the story of a second missing girl. Camille reluctantly agrees and
slowly, as only Gillian Flynn can, the background of Camille and her
reluctance is laid out in the open.
I find one of the best
things about Gillian Flynn's narrative style is how she uses the first
person narrative voice and so forces you to experience the story as the
main character. And for a while you trust and are lulled by the main
character's point of view. You agree with them. You don't question them.
Then, when you are good and comfortable, she smacks you with some
objective truth or secret about the main character. And you realize you
really knew nothing all along.
In this case, we slowly learn
about Camille and her childhood. Flynn takes some pains not to make
Camille completely unlikeable. In fact, I caught myself liking her
despite myself. This debut novel is certainly not as polished as Gone Girl or Dark Places (you can read my review of Dark Places here), but it's timing of reveals is pretty brilliant. And
while I did sort of predict the ending, it was still satisfying
nonetheless. There were a few tropes that I felt cheapened the story a
bit - for example, a line by one of the detectives that he's "fallen"
for Camille. The whole dialogue in that section seemed out of character
for the book.
Gillian Flynn is a master at writing and delving
into unlikeable characters. Her heroes are always flawed and damaged.
And there is something rewarding about that, as a reader, to explore
with her.
5/5 Stars.
No comments:
Post a Comment